Eighth Circuit Determines CRP Payments Are Not Subject to SE Tax for Non-Farmers

By Joshua A. Diveley.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has reversed a prior decision of the U.S. Tax Court and found that Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) payments made to non-farmers constitute rentals from real estate for purposes of §1402(a)(1) and are excluded from the self-employment tax.

The Tax Court previously ruled in favor of the IRS and found that a non-farmer who inherited rental farm ground, signed a CRP agreement with the federal government and engaged agents to perform the landowner’s requirements under the agreement was in the trade or business of farming and was therefore subject to self-employment tax on the CRP payments.

The Eighth Circuit reversed the decision and determined that prior IRS guidance and court cases have found that a non-farmer should be distinguished from an farmer active in the farming operation and applied that distinction to the present facts.

See Rollin Morehouse v. Commissioner of the IRS available at: http://media.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/14/10/133110P.pdf

© 2014 Parsonage Vandenack Williams LLC

For more information, Contact Us

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s